Login
Section Computer Science

Convolutional Neural Network Achieves 97.67 Percent Accuracy for Alzheimer MRI Classification

Convolutional Neural Network Mencapai Akurasi 97,67 Persen untuk Klasifikasi MRI Alzheimer
Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): June :

Ichwan Puja Pangestu (1), Vitri Tundjungsari (2)

(1) Program Studi Teknik Informatika, Universitas Esa Unggul Jakarta, Indonesia
(2) Program Studi Teknik Informatika, Universitas Esa Unggul Jakarta, Indonesia
Fulltext View | Download

Abstract:

Abstract
General Background: Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder requiring accurate and accessible diagnostic support. Specific Background: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is widely used for structural brain assessment, and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) enable automated feature extraction from medical images. Knowledge Gap: Prior studies report high classification performance but rarely integrate comprehensive evaluation with real-time deployment for decision support. Aims: This study develops and evaluates a CNN-based model for classifying 2D axial MRI images into Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), and Common Normal (CN), alongside web-based implementation. Results: Using approximately 5,000 ADNI MRI images, the model achieved 97.67% accuracy, 97.73% precision, 97.67% recall, and 97.65% F1-score, with AUC values near 1.00. Learning curves indicated stable convergence without overfitting or underfitting, and confusion matrix analysis confirmed consistent multi-class discrimination. The deployed Hugging Face–Gradio application generated predictions in under five seconds per scan without performance degradation. Novelty: This research combines rigorous multi-metric validation with interactive web deployment as an artificial intelligence decision support system for early AD screening. Implications: The findings demonstrate the technical feasibility of CNN-based MRI classification for preliminary cognitive disorder screening, while emphasizing the need for multimodal integration and prospective clinical validation.


Highlights
• Achieved robust multi-class discrimination among AD, MCI, and CN categories using axial brain scans.
• Demonstrated stable training dynamics validated through loss convergence and receiver operating characteristics.
• Implemented an interactive artificial intelligence platform with sub-five-second prediction time.


Keywords
Alzheimers Disease; Convolutional Neural Networks; MRI Classification; Deep Learning; Clinical Decision Support System

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] H. Chen, “Alzheimer’s Disease Classification Using Brain MRI Based on Combination of Convolutional Neural Network and Random Forest Model,” Highlights Sci. Eng. Technol., vol. 14, pp. 203–212, Sept. 2022, doi: 10.54097/hset.v14i.1694.

[2] R. Davuluri and R. Rengaswamy, “Improved Classification Model using CNN for Detection of Alzheimer’s Disease,” J. Comput. Sci., vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 415–425, May 2022, doi: 10.3844/jcssp.2022.415.425.

[3] N. W. Suriastini et al., “Community health centers response to the need of dementia care,” J. Public Health Res., vol. 12, no. 1, p. 227990362311619, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1177/22799036231161972.

[4] N. Nurbaiti, S. G. Sutoro, E. Supriyaningsih, S. W. Wiyanti, and I. Maesaroh, “Edukasi untuk Deteksi Dini dan Perawatan Lansia dengan Alzheimer di Masa Pandemi Covid-19,” J. Kreat. Pengabdi. Kpd. Masy. PKM, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 2887–2895, June 2023, doi: 10.33024/jkpm.v6i7.10093.

[5] S. Chen et al., “The global macroeconomic burden of Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias: estimates and projections for 152 countries or territories,” Lancet Glob. Health, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. e1534–e1543, Sept. 2024, doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00264-X.

[6] Y. N. Fu’adah, I. Wijayanto, N. K. C. Pratiwi, F. F. Taliningsih, S. Rizal, and M. A. Pramudito, “Automated Classification of Alzheimer’s Disease Based on MRI Image Processing using Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) with AlexNet Architecture,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1844, no. 1, p. 012020, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1844/1/012020.

[7] ADNI, “Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative.” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://adni.loni.usc.edu/

[8] Siddharta Dan et al., “Therapeutic and Diagnostic Applications of Nanocomposites in the Treatment Alzheimer’s Disease Studies,” Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 940–960, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.33263/BRIAC121.940960.

[9] V. García-Morales et al., “Current Understanding of the Physiopathology, Diagnosis and Therapeutic Approach to Alzheimer’s Disease,” Biomedicines, vol. 9, no. 12, p. 1910, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9121910.

[10] D. Y. R. Al Khayari and H. Abdallah Nasser Al Shamsi, “Optimizing MRI Preprocessing Techniques for Enhanced Alzheimer’s Disease Detection,” Int. J. Emerg. Multidiscip. Comput. Sci. Artif. Intell., vol. 3, no. 1, May 2024, doi: 10.54938/ijemdcsai.2024.03.1.289.

[11] L. Alzubaidi et al., “Review of deep learning: concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions,” J. Big Data, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 53, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1186/s40537-021-00444-8.

[12] M. M. Taye, “Theoretical Understanding of Convolutional Neural Network: Concepts, Architectures, Applications, Future Directions,” Computation, vol. 11, no. 3, p. 52, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.3390/computation11030052.

[13] A. W. Fazil, M. Hakimi, R. Akbari, M. M. Quchi, and K. Q. Khaliqyar, “Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Data Classification: An In-Depth Exploration,” J. Comput. Sci. Technol. Stud., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 160–168, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.32996/jcsts.2023.5.4.16.

[14] R. Barinov, V. Gai, G. Kuznetsov, and V. Golubenko, “Automatic Evaluation of Neural Network Training Results,” Computers, vol. 12, no. 2, p. 26, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.3390/computers12020026.

[15] I. Markoulidakis, I. Rallis, I. Georgoulas, G. Kopsiaftis, A. Doulamis, and N. Doulamis, “Multiclass Confusion Matrix Reduction Method and Its Application on Net Promoter Score Classification Problem,” Technologies, vol. 9, no. 4, p. 81, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.3390/technologies9040081.

[16] A. Arafa, M. Radad, M. Badawy, and N. El-Fishawy, “Logistic Regression Hyperparameter Optimization for Cancer Classification,” Menoufia J. Electron. Eng. Res., vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 0–0, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.21608/mjeer.2021.70512.1034.

[17] P. Rani, R. Lamba, R. K. Sachdeva, K. Kumar, and C. Iwendi, “A machine learning model for Alzheimer’s disease prediction,” IET Cyber-Phys. Syst. Theory Appl., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 125–134, June 2024, doi: 10.1049/cps2.12090.

[18] A. C. J. W. Janssens and F. K. Martens, “Reflection on modern methods: Revisiting the area under the ROC Curve,” Int. J. Epidemiol., vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 1397–1403, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1093/ije/dyz274.

[19] V. Tundjungsari, Dasar Machine Learning, Edisi Revisi. Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2024.