Abstract:
Political dynasties represent a systemic challenge to Indonesia’s constitutional democracy by consolidating hereditary power that contradicts the principles of meritocracy, equal political access, and institutional accountability. This research aims to analyze how political dynasties distort democratic governance and weaken constitutional mechanisms that safeguard state integrity. Using a library research method supported by systematic content analysis of academic literature, legal sources, and policy documents, the study finds that dynastic politics institutionalize oligarchic power structures, suppress competitive leadership regeneration, and increase risks of corruption, collusion, and nepotism. The findings demonstrate that dynastic networks interfere with the separation of powers, politicize public resource allocation, bias representative functions toward familial interests, and reduce institutional autonomy within the constitutional framework. Although dynasties may provide policy continuity in certain contexts, these advantages are conditional and outweighed by structural threats to legal integrity and public trust. The novelty of this study lies in extending the discussion from electoral and regional governance to the broader constitutional domain, characterizing dynastic politics as a constitutional disruption rather than merely a political phenomenon. The implications suggest the need for transparent political recruitment, regulatory restrictions on hereditary candidacy, enhanced oversight mechanisms, and civic education to reinforce democratic resilience. These measures are essential to prevent the normalization of hereditary power and to protect constitutional democracy in Indonesia from long-term institutional degradation.
Highlights
• Political dynasties weaken constitutional accountability and democratic governance
• Hereditary power restricts leadership succession and public institutional autonomy
• Oligarchic networks increase corruption risks and distort public representation
Keywords
Political Dynasties; Constitutional Democracy; Democratic Governance; Meritocracy; Oligarchic Power
Downloads
References
[1] T. Abufatih, A. Maskur, and S. Alba, “Dismantling political dynasties: Transformation of Pancasila democracy in the context of family power,” Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 45–62, 2024.
[2] A. I. Ananda, “The influence of political dynasty on the democracy climate,” Constitutional Law Society Journal, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 12–25, 2023.
[3] N. P. I. Armitha Pratiwi and I. M. M. Widyantara, “The phenomenon of political dynasties in regional head elections and their impact on democracy in Indonesia,” Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 55–70, 2025.
[4] E. Aspinall and W. Berenschot, Democracy for sale: Elections, clientelism, and the state in Indonesia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2020.
[5] N. Choi, “Local political dynasties in Indonesia: Strengthening power through patronage and informal networks,” Asian Journal of Political Science, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 214–232, 2021.
[6] N. Darmawan, “Dinasti politik dan tantangan demokrasi lokal di Indonesia,” Jurnal Politik, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 130–147, 2022.
[7] F. Dona, “Dinasti politik di era otonomi daerah dalam perspektif demokrasi,” Al-Ahkam Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah dan Hukum, vol. 7, 2022.
[8] E. Fitriyah and D. Rahmawati, “Political dynasties and the erosion of meritocracy in Indonesia’s regional governance,” Journal of Government and Politics, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 88–102, 2023.
[9] K. Gadafi and S. Nelwati, “Dampak dinasti politik terhadap culture demokrasi Pancasila di Indonesia,” [Nama Jurnal Tidak Tercantum], vol. 2, no. 3, 2024.
[10] V. R. Hadiz, “Resisting Indonesia’s oligarchy,” Journal of Contemporary Asia, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 68–82, 2017.
[11] N. Hikmawati, “Dampak politik dinasti terhadap akuntabilitas dan transparansi pemerintahan daerah di Indonesia,” Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Nusantara, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 101–115, 2023.
[12] D. Larasati and F. Rezki, “Political dynasties and local government spending in Indonesia,” Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 55–70, 2024.
[13] S. T. Maulia, “Politik dinasti dalam perspektif demokrasi di Indonesia,” Journal of Practice Learning and Educational Development, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 118–125, 2024.
[14] I. Puansah, O. Sukmana, and V. S. D. Soedarwo, “Political dynasties in village government and their impact on society and development,” [Nama Jurnal Tidak Tercantum], vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 119–136, 2024.
[15] A. A. Rahma, A. A. Oktaviani, A. Hofifah, T. Z. Ahda, and R. G. Nugraha, “Pengaruh dinasti politik terhadap perkembangan demokrasi Pancasila di Indonesia,” Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 2260–2269, 2022.
[16] A. Rasyid, “Dinasti politik dan degradasi prinsip representasi dalam pemilihan kepala daerah,” Jurnal Demokrasi & Politik Lokal, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 33–48, 2022.
[17] T. Seran and H. Risyah, “Politik dinasti dalam perspektif administrasi menjelang Pemilu 2024,” Jurnal Terapan Pemerintahan Minangkabau, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 77–92, 2024.
[18] R. Setiawan, “Political dynasty and governance quality: Evidence from local politics in Indonesia,” Public Administration Journal, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 144–159, 2021.
[19] L. Suryani, “Patronage, nepotism, and political dynasties in contemporary Indonesia,” Jurnal Sosiologi Politik, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 50–67, 2023.
[20] R. A. Dwianto, A. B. Darmawan, and Salahudin, “Meta-Analysis as a Research Tool: A Systematic Review of Bibliometric Studies in Political Dynasty,” Journal of Indonesian Social Sciences and Humanities, 2023.