Predictive Maintenance Implementation In Reach Stacker Kalmar Type Drd To Reduce Component Failure

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/r.e.m.v3i1.1538

Author (s)


(1) * Ponidi Ponidi   (Teknik Mesin, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya)  
        Indonesia
(2)  Ali Makhfud   (Teknik Mesin, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya)  
        Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The Reach Stacker lifting tool is the most productive lifting tool for container lifting today. It can move container till 20 container box in every hour, it means that in 3 minutes it can lift and lower 1 box container. In operation the lifting equipment will surely experience a stop operation due to the failure of a component. The purpose of this study was to determine critical and important components of the history of failure data for a year (2016) in PT meratusline, by using tools Fault Tree Analysis, Failure Mode and Effect Analysis and Pareto. From the analysis, it obtained Load Handling component as the most critical component based on the most frequent failure and required a long time to repair. The cause of the failure itself was inconsistent greasing maintenance / Predictive maintenance was not executed and there was no loose handling of Load Handling chain components. From the result of research, it was suggested to make standard rule by adding greasing item in worksheet Predictive maintenance and Standard Operating Procedure Predictive Maintenance for chain replacement on Load Hadling component if already entering 12000 Hour life.



Keywords

Type of Demage; FTA; FMEA; Pareto Diagram; Maintenance



Full Text: PDF



References


[1] British Standard, BS EN 13460:2002, Maintenance Documents for maintenance, BSI, London.

[2] Jim August, “Applied Reliability Centered Maintenance,” Pennwell publishers, 500pp, 1999.

[3] Kelly, A., “Maintenance Strategy,” Business Centred Maintenance, Oxford Butterworth Heinemann, 1997.

[4] Marvin Rausand and A. Heyland, In System Reliability Theory,” 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey.p.160, 2004.

[5] Michael V Brown,”Building a PM program brick by brick,” New Standard Institute Inc Publications, 2003.

[6] Mobley, R.K., “Introduction to Preventive Maintenance,” 2nd ed, Butterworth Heinemann, Elsevier, pp 4, 2002.

[7] Narayan, V., “In Effective maintenance management,” New York: Industrial Press Inc. p.33, 2004.

[8] Robson Quinello, Ford Motor Co. Brasil, “Maintenance and Six Sigma,” Web based article, 2003.

[9] Stanley (Stan) T. Grabill, Sigma Breakthrough Technologies, Inc. Web based article, 2001.

[10] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareto_analysis (diakses Oktober 2013).


Article View

Abstract views : 24 times | PDF files viewed : 24 times

Dimensions, PlumX, and Google Scholar Metrics

10.21070/r.e.m.v3i1.1538




Copyright (c) 2018 R.E.M. (Rekayasa Energi Manufaktur) Jurnal

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.