Dispute Settlement Patterns on The Village Chief Election in Indonesia (Lumajang Regency)

In the year of 2013, Lumajang Regency Pilkades, and all about voice counting result of Regulation No. 6 year 2012 do not state any matter of dispute in village headman election and mechanism of solution, but Local Government Regulation determines Watchdog Committee in the level of Team of Village Governance Issues Completion supervision by preventive and repressive act. Supervision communications and socialization to the Committee about the importance of honest, fair and democratic through repressive act by facilitating the parties if monitoring well, proven from 159 Pilkades non litigation process. Existence of Watchdog Committee is supported from help of region budget (APBD) that is packed into Pilkades.


2.1The Rule of Village Chief Selection In Lumajang Regency
The administration area of Lumajang    Watchdog Committee activities and the commitment of the organizers of to the existence of a clear policy and the budget support Rp. 15.500.000,-).This fund is from Lumajang region budget relief fund, and submitted to the village government for inclusion in the costs, with the following details: Rp. 7,500,000.-forp. 6,000,000 for organizers, and Rp.2,000,000, disputes settlement on Pilkades, government of Lumajang also formed a Watchdog Committee, this team also ex-officio.
there are problems to be resolved, the settlement mechanism start with a troubled village and tries everything possible so that the problem can be done there on Lumajang government's commitment to conducting the while maintaining order and public security.Therefore problem can be resolved soon, village government activities can be immediately without being bothered by the post-election unsettled Pilkades dispute.The results after the his team is on a district level, with the following start with a team came a troubled village and tries everything possible so that the problem can be done there on

Conclusions
The study showed that there are four disputes related to the electoral vote result, which is exclude the competence of the judiciary.
one case resolved through the cour the Watchdog Committee at the will be assigned to Team of Village Governance Issues Completion In addition, the lack of the and success of intensive socialization done by the Village Consultative Council (BPD), and The existence of the Watchdog Committee disputes settlement, needs to be enhanced in terms of was given accordance to the member their each basic tasks and functions of the law awareness and knowledge of the competent authorities to resolve the dispute provided the exercise of democracy at the village level. 14Taufik, "Interviewed by Fauziyah" (Head of Legal Division on Lumajang Regency: 17 May, 2015).
Dispute Settlement Patterns on The Village Chief Election In Indonesia (Lumajang Regency) not been calculated.The Watchdog Committee was already there in place of securing the results of the vote count that was already done and k card, both of which already counted or not.Once the situation that the number of the vote card that had not been calculated, much less than the difference between the acquisition of the results of the vote count that already done, so the calculation was unlikely affect the existing provisional results.
Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, All right reserved, This is an open access article under n Indonesia (Lumajang Muhammadiyah Jember, Jl.Karimata 49 Jember, East Java, (hereinafter referred to as leader in the village.Done with direct followed by local people who qualify occur.The existing legislation regulations indicate the included in the competence of the judiciary.mechanism is non litigation 2 .For institutions can be accepted by institutions based on Local Regulation ( important because for local Government and becomes a reflection of government services and the o community at the village level, as the spearhead of the structure of Therefore, the existence of Perda that have competence in the Pilkades The judiciary was not on duty and authorized to be supervisors and break the dispute based upon the selection process itself such as the question of the campaign and the vote count.The results of previous research in Bondowoso found be handled by a Watchdog Team inauguration 4 . of candidates elected.c.Ratification and Inauguration of the 2.2 Institution to Handle Pilkades One important component Committee in the Sub-district level form of communication and socialization (BPD), and Pilkades Committee about the importance of honest, fair and democratic pilkades, as well as repressive action in the event of a dispute on the the parties.The formation of Watchdog Committee The membership of the Perbup 25/2006 10 that is 5 (five) persons, composed of Head of the Sub-District Secretary as Secretary, and The Commander of the Head of the Police Sector / Chief of The Governement Section in Sub This Watchdog Committee have task actively, received complain reports of (seven) days minimum after reports of the complaints received that cannot be resolved to the Team of Village Governance Issues Completion days minimum after the complaint is received of Nation's Unity And Political d.Head of Pamong Praja units; e. Head of Legal Division; f.Head of Government Division g.Village Government Elements Similarly to Watchdog Committee If there are problems to be resolved, the settlement to a troubled village and tries everything possible so that the problem can be done there on that day.This relates to the Lumajang true, honest and fair of Pilkades while maintaining order and public security.problem can be resolved soon, village government activities can be without being bothered by the post 12 Aksan, "Interviewed by Fauziyah" (Village Government D Dispute Settlement Patterns on The Village Chief Election In Indonesia (Lumajang Regency) Team of Village Governance Issues Completion.On this team, both Perda 24/2006, Perbup Perbup 25/2006 do not specify further.The results show that this team is on a district level, with Aksan, "Interviewed by Fauziyah" (Village Government Division on Lumajang Regency: 2 April, 2015).
appear in the Jatimulyo between the number of the invitation ballot box.In the Pilkades, there is a doc as a standard 'supervision' of who and how many voters, who and how to be invited to do election, and who and how that comes to use the right Ideally, the number of voters present card which is contained in the ballot box.card in the ballot box, it was more voters who used his voice.This triggered protests, a little vote counts).Upon this s (3) vote cards are taken at random, and difference of first and second figure excess of three (3) vote cardis not count at Jatimulyo Pilkades.b.Lempeni Village In Lempeni Pilkades, case occured satisfying for candidates who did result only 3 (three) vote between the first and second rank which led to the rejection of the communicate with the problematic they are agreed to do a recount in parties, especially the Pilkades candidate c.Banyuputih Lor Village There is a strife in the Banyuputih begun.Started with the entry of angry group few vote (most likely lost) in counting area.They shed vote box 13 Moh.Arif, "Interviewed by Fauziyah" (Village Government Division on Lumajang Regency: 13 June, 2015).
lkades candidate and supporters, inevitably received the results of the vote Randuagung Village 14 , Pilkades results disputed submitted to the by the party who rejected the vote counting results, but the competencies issue.Later, plaintiff filed a lawsuit to the through PTUN.On the first level, PTUN granted the suit.government appeals to PT-TUN, and the appellate level PT the lawsuit of vote count result.that there are four disputes related to the electoral vote result, the competence of the judiciary.Three are settled outside the judiciary one case resolved through the court.The settlement outside the judiciary was Committee at the sub-districts level.If the dispute still cannot be resolve Team of Village Governance Issues Completion at the district level.he lack of the Pilkades disputes in Lumajang is a form of communication and success of intensive socialization done by the Watchdog Committee to the village officer, Consultative Council (BPD), and Pilkades Committee.Watchdog Committee who also acted as a facilitator to be enhanced in terms of structure and mechanism.accordance to the member of Watchdog Committee need to be examined again basic tasks and functions especially at the level of sub-districts.The development and knowledge of the people, requires the existence of an 'agency' resolve the dispute accordance to the protection of the law and democracy at the village level.Taufik, "Interviewed by Fauziyah" (Head of Legal Division on Lumajang Regency: 17 May, 2015).__ 59 Dispute Settlement Patterns on The Village Chief Election In Indonesia (Lumajang Regency) was already there in place of securing the results of the vote count that was already done and kept card, both of which already counted or not.Once the situation not been calculated, much less than the difference between the acquisition of the results of the vote count that was affect the existing provisional results.the results of the vote submitted to the , but the court reject the vote count suit.Upon the TUN, and the appellate level PT-TUN that there are four disputes related to the electoral vote result, Interviewed by Fauziyah" (Head of Legal Division on Lumajang Regency: 17 May, 2015).

on The Village Chief Election in Indonesia (Lumajang
In the year of 2013, Lumajang Regency carries out 159 village chief election (Pilkades).There are 4 disputes of , and all about voice counting result of Pilkades.Local Regulation No. 24 year 2006 and Local not state any matter of dispute in village headman election and mechanism of solution, but Local Government Regulation determines Watchdog Committee /ojs.umsida.ac.id/index.php/rechtsideehttp://dx.doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v3i1.159 and the institutionsThe judiciary was not on duty and authorized to be supervisors and break the dispute based upon the selection process itself such as the question of the campaign and the vote disputes embryos can can complete the stages up to the government barriers, , Kesembilan (Jakarta: Haji Masagung, 1990).(Jakarta:MandarMaju,Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia(Dari Orla, Orba Sampai Reformasi)Telaah Sosiologis (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, on The Village Chief Election at View Item Google Original Research Article Dispute Settlement Patterns on The Village Chief Election In Indonesia (Lumajang Regency) F. Fauziyah, Sri Praptianingsih.

Patterns on The Village Chief Election In Indonesia (Lumajang Regency) Rule of Village Chief Selection In Lumajang Regency
198 villages spread over 21 districts.(March 2015) done, already established 156 election of village chief who carried out synchronously in 2013, and it filled all the stages of the election until it came to the inauguration of the elected village chief.
5 Jo.Local Regulation Number 6 Number 24 of 2006 on The Procedures For The Selection Inauguration, and Dismissal of the Village Head Local Regulation, governed more by the Election Guidelines of Nomination, Appointment Head (hereinafter referred to Perbup 2006 on The Changes of District Head Regulation Guidelines of Nomination, Appointment (hereinafter referred to Perbup 25/2006).Conducting the election of institutions, namely Head of the Sub Pilkades Committee.Furthermore, with the following stages: 5 Kabupaten Lumajang, Perda Nomor 24 Tahun 2006 Tentang Tata Cara Pemilihan, P 7 Kabupaten Lumajang, Perbup Nomor 22 Tahun 2006 Tentang Pedoman Pemilihan, Pencalonan, Pengangkatan, Pelantikan Dan Pemberhentian Kepala Desa Series, 2006). 8upaten Lumajang, Perbup Nomor 25 Tahun 2006 Tentang Perubahan Peraturan Bupati Lumajang Nomor 22 Tahun 2006 Tentang Pedoman Pemilihan, Pencalonan, Pengangkatan, Pelantikan Dan Pemberhentian Kepala Desa (District Head Regulation No. 25: RR No. 38 E Series, 2006).Dispute Settlement and Dismissal of the Village Head (hereinafter Perda 6/2012) 6 .In addition, this more by the District Head Regulation Number 22 of Nomination, Appointment, Inauguration and Dismissal of Perbup 22/2006) 7 .Jo. District Head Regulation Number District Head Regulation Number 22 of 2006 on T Nomination, Appointment, Inauguration and Dismissal of the Village Head 25/2006).theelection of the village chief in Lumajang is managed by three of the Sub-District, Village Consultative Council (BPD)Furthermore, conducting the election of the head of the village is(District Head Regulation No. 25: RR No. 38 E Series, 2006).__ 55

9
Lumajang, Perbup Nomor 22 Tahun 2006 Tentang Pedoman Pemilihan, Pencalonan, Pengangkatan, Pelantikan Dan Pemberhentian Kepala Desa 10 Lumajang, Perbup Nomor 25 Tahun 2006 Tentang Perubahan Peraturan Bupati Lumajang Nomor 22 Tahun 2006 Tentang Pedoman Pemilihan, Pencalonan, Pengangkatan, Pelantikan Dan Pemberhentian Kepala Desa of the Village Chief Pilkades Disputes in Lumajang ne important component in Pilkades in Lumajang is the existence of the evel who are in charge of conducting preventive action in the ation and socialization to the village officer, Village Consultative Council Committee about the importance of honest, fair and democratic ction in the event of a dispute on the pilkades by facilitat Watchdog Committee specified regulated in Perbup The membership of the Watchdog Committee are ex-officio, already defined in that is 5 (five) persons, composed of Head of Sub-District as a Chairman, Secretary as Secretary, and The Commander of the Koramil Head of the Police Sector / Chief of The Governement Section in Sub-District as members.

Settlement Patterns on The Village Chief Election In Indonesia (Lumajang Regency)
F. Fauziyah, Sri Praptianingsih.Committee activities can be guarded well, thanks to the existence of a clear policy and the budget to the activities of the Pilkades (Rp.15.500.000,allocating to Pilkades relief fund village budget as Pilkades costs funds during the Pilkades, Rp.

on The Village Chief Election In Indonesia (Lumajang Regency)
Rechtsidee, 3 (1), June 2016, P. ISSN.2338-8595, E. ISSN.2443Journal Homepage: http://ojs.umsida.ac.id/index.php/rechtsideeDOILink: http://dx.doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v3i1.159Pilkades in Lumajang in general it can be stated worked well, as evidenced by the Pilkades in 2013, appears only 4 (four) cases relates to the Pilkades with 3 Watchdog Committee, and one (1) case filed to PTUN.Such cases as The cases that appear in the Jatimulyo village caused by the existence of a difference nvitation letter and the number of the voting card that is in the , there is a document called the book of voters list that can be used ' of who and how many voters, who and how to be invited to do , and who and how that comes to use the right candidate at the time of the , the number of voters present and use his voice, equal to the number of the card which is contained in the ballot box.But, there was a difference, the number of the it was more than the 3 (three) cards, compared with the present list of This triggered protests, especially from a candidate who 'lost ).Upon this state, Perbup is already set up clearly, before the tally at random, and then start counting.The final results figure Pilkades candidate gained more than 100. is not significant to influence the results of the electoral case occured when the results of the vote count wa satisfying for candidates who did not won.When the vote count ended, the difference in the between the first and second rank.As a result, discon which led to the rejection of the vote count.Hence, the Watchdog Committee problematic parties or particularly Pilkades candidate.The agreed to do a recount in sub-districts office.Upon the results of the recount, the candidate could receive the result properly.Banyuputih Lor village which is arises at the counting Started with the entry of angry group supporting one of the candidates who gain in counting area.They shed vote box that still contained a card Moh.Arif, "Interviewed by Fauziyah" (Village Government Division on Lumajang Regency: 13 June, 2015).F.Fauziyah, Sri Praptianingsih.thathad not been calculated.The elections took action and securing the results of the vote count that was already done and k the number of existing vote card, both of which already counted or not.Once the situation was under control, discovered that the much less than the difference between the acquisition of the results of the vote count that Moh. Arif, "Interviewed by Fauziyah" (Village Government Division on Lumajang Regency: 13 June, 2015).