Penanggulangan Korupsi Berbasis Partisipasi Masyarakat Pada PNPM Mandiri Perkotaan Di Kabupaten Sidoarjo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/psikologia.v2i1.1495

Author (s)


(1) * Hazim Hazim   (Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo)  
        Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


A prevention of corruption in Indonesia through structural approach has been examined by many scholars. The gap is, there is not found a study related to this issue focusing on cultural approach. For this reason, this study is concentrated on the public participation in order to prevent the corruption which focuses on the Urban Poverty Projects (PNPM Mandiri Perkotaan) in Sidoarjo, East Java, as a case study.  The research questions are: a) to what extend the community base participant impacts the reduce corruptions?; b) what are the modes of public participation in order to prevent the corruptions?. The aim of this study investigates the mode of community participations in order to minimize the corruption. A descriptive qualitative approach was used to collect the data which used three main methods: a) observation concentrated at two sub-districts, Taman and Sidoarjo; b) interview conducted for getting valuable information from the program executors and beneficiaries of “PNPM Mandiri Perkotaan” as well; c) a study of documents related to the program such as the standart operational procedures (SOPs) as well as proposal and report documents. Some theoretical framewoks of participations have been used to analyse the data. The results of this study can be seen that there are three stages of public participation in order to prevent the corruption: the first is the plan stage. Generally, public still need to be forced to participate at this step. However public have showed significant participations through thought and physical participation with skills. The second is the implementation stage. Public have been able to do self-mobilization participation including physical, psychological participation and participation with skills at this step. Moreover, they also have contributed significantly through financial participation instead of getting income from their involments. However, in the last step called monitoring and evaluation, they generally need to be encouraged by external factors to participate in this stage. Regularly meeting is a part of their participation in order to evaluate their projects.  



Keywords

Participation; Corruption; PNPM Mandiri Perkotaan



Full Text: PDF



References


Arnstein, S. (1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, Volume 35, No. 4, Juli 1969. pp. 216-224.

Iskandar. (2009). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan dan Sosial (Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif), Jakarta: Gaung Persada Press

Kartono, K. (1983). Pathologi Sosial. Jakarta: Edisi Baru. CV. Rajawali Press.

Davis, K. & Newstrom, J. W. (1995). Perilaku Dalam Organisasi. Edisi Ketujuh. Terjemahan. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum, 2010. Tentang P2KP. (http://p2kp.org/aboutdetil.asp? mid=4& catid= 2&), [diakses tanggal 22 September 2012.

…………, (2010). Pedoman pelaksanaan PNPM Mandiri Perkotaan, Jakarta.

Kumorotomo, W. (1992). Etika Administrasi Negara, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers : Mikkelsen, Britha, 2006, Metode Penelitian Partisipatoris dan Upaya-upaya Pemberdayaan, terjemah, Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Mulyana, D. (2001). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nurboko, C., & Ahmadi, A. (1997). Metodologi Penelitian, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Septiani, M. (2010). Peningkatan Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam PNPM Mandiri Perkotaan, “Studi kasus di Tlogomas Lowokwaru Kota Malang”. Muhammad Iqbal. 2007, Analisis Peran Pemangku Kepentingan dan Implementasinya dalam Pembangunan Pertanian, Jurnal Litbang Pertanian, Vol.. 26, No, 3, hal. 91-92.

Pretty, J. (1995). Regenerating Agriculture: Policies and practice for sustainability and selfreliance. Earthscan Publications, London.

Purnamasari, I. (2008). Studi Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam perencanaan pembangunan di Kecamatan Cibadak, Kabupaten Sukabumi, [Tesis], Semarang, Program Pasca Sarjana Universitas Diponegoro.

Revida, E. (2003), Korupsi Di Indonesia: Masalah Dan Solusinya, https://docs. google.com/ viewer?a=v&q=cache: JGdedAEhheUJ: repository.usu.ac.id/bitstream/123456789/3800/1/fisiprika1.pdf+penanggulangan+korupsi+menurut+Erika, [diakses 20/2/2012].

Sastropoetro, S.R.A (1988). Partisipasi, Komunikasi, Persuasi, dan Disiplin dalam Pembangunan Nasional. Bandung: Alumni.

Subagyo, J. (2004). Metode Penelitian dalam Teori dan Praktek,Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Sumardjo & Saharudin. (2003). Metode-metode partisipatif dalam pengembangan masyarakat. Jurusan ulmu-ilmu sosial ekonomi, Bogor: Fakultas pertanian IPB.

Sumiyarsono, E. (2010). Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Pembangunan dan Pengelolaan Prasarana Penyediaan Air Bersih Di Desa Wawosu Dan Desa Mataiwoi Kecamatan Kolono Kabupaten Konawe Selatan Provinsi Sulawesi Tenggara, [Tesis], Semarang, Program Pascasarjana Magister Teknik Pembangunan Wilayah dan Kota Universitas Diponegoro.

Wahyudi, I. (2010). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Korupsi Anggaran Pendapatan Belanja Daerah (APBD) Di Malang Raya, http://ejournal.umm.ac.id/ index.php/legality/article/view/277, [diakses, tanggal 20/2/2011]

Yulianti, Y. (2012). Analisis Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Pelaksanaan Program Nasional Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (PNPM) Mandiri Perkotaan Di Kota Solok, [Tesis], Padang, Program Pasca Sarjana Universitas Andalas.


Article View

Abstract views : 74 times | PDF files viewed : 28 times

Dimensions, PlumX, and Google Scholar Metrics

10.21070/psikologia.v2i1.1495


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2018 Psikologia : Jurnal Psikologi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.