Ketidakjujuran Akademik pada Calon Guru Agama

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/psikologia.v2i1.1258

Author (s)


(1) * Herdian Herdian   (Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto)  
        Indonesia
(2)  Dyah Astorini Wulandari   (Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto)
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The purpose of this study is how the forms of dishonest behavior in situations doing paper work, mid semester exam and final exam of the semester and describe the purpose of behaving dishonestly. Participants in this study are 29 students of 4th semester of Islamic studies education program at university x in Purwokerto. This research uses qualitative method with vignette open questionnaire data retrieval tool known as method to reveal values in individual and data analysis using content analysis. Based on the results of this study revealed that the task situation is the most used situation by students to do academic dishonesty. Academic forms of academic dishonesty work on paper assignments, mid semester exam and final semester exam is asking / asking answers, cheating / looking at friends' answers, quoting blogs, copying paste, copying answers, opening small papers. While the purpose of academic disagreement on the situation of doing paper assignments, mid semester exam and final exam of the semester that is to be / easy to do, work completed / quickly completed, for friends to teach / get answers, not difficult in doing, accurate answers, good value, -same cackling with friends and borrowing to copy.



Keywords

Academic Dishonesty; Honesty; Prospective Teacher



Full Text: PDF



References


Anderman, E.M., & Murdock, T.B. (2007).The Psychology Of Academic Cheating. California: Elsevier Academic Press

Arianto, T. (2013).Tingkat Kejujuran Sosial Dan Akademik Mahasiswa Pendidikan Biologi.Prosiding Seminar Nasional X Pendidikan Biologi, 10 (1) dari http://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id/index.php/prosbio/articlm e/view/3095

Ariska, F. (2015). Ketidakjujuran Akademik Mahasiswa Perguruan Tinggi X Di Surakarta. Skripsi (tidak diterbitkan). Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Brimble, M., & Clark, P.T. (2005). Perceptions of the Prevalence and Seriousness of Academic Dishonesty in Australian Universities The Australia.Educational Researcher. 32 (3), 19-44

Davis, S. F., Drinan, P. F., & Gallant, T.B. (2009).Cheating In School. United Kingdom: Wiley-Blackwell

Diekhoff.G., LaBeff, E., Clark, R., Williams, L., Francis, B., & Haines, J. V. (1996) College Cheating: Ten Years Later. Research in Higher Education, 37 (4) ,487–502

Finch, J. (1978).The Vignette technique in survey research. Sosiology, 21 (1), 105-144. Doi: 10.1177/0038038587021001008

Handayani & Baridwan. (2013). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi perilaku ketidakjujuran akademik: modifikasi theory of planed behaviour. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa FEB, 2 (1) dipetik Agustus 3, 2015 dari http://portalgaruda.org/?ref=browse&mod=view article&article=189226

Hartanto, D. (2012). Bimbingan & Konseling Menyontek: Mengungkap Akar Masalah dan Solusinya. Jakarta: Penerbit Indeks.

Herdian.(2016). Dinamika Psikologis Ketidakjujuran Akademik Pada Calon Pendidik.Tesis (tidak diterbitkan) diunduh dari http://eprints.ums.ac.id/45021/1/HALAMAN%20D EPAN.pdf pada tanggal 29 Juli 2017

Ihsanudin.(2015). Anggota DPR yang Terbukti Gunakan Gelar Palsu Terancam Sanksi.Kompas [Online]. Dipetik Agustus 3, 2015 dari (http://nasional.kompas.com/read/2015/05/27/18251061/Anggota.DPR.yang.Terbukti.Gunakan.Gelar.Palsu.Terancam.Sanksi.)

Jensen, L, A., Arnett, J. J., Feldman, S. S., & Cauffman, E. (2002). It’s Wrong, But Everybody Does It: Academic Dishonesty Among High School And College Students. Contemporary Educational Psychology 27, 209–228

Jones, L. R. (2011). Academic Integrity & Academic Dishonesty: A Handbook About Cheating & Plagiarism. Floride Institude of Technology Revised &Expanded Edition diambil dari www.fit.edu/current/documents/plagiarism.pdf

Jordan, A. E. (2001). College Student Cheating: The Role Of Motivation, Perceived Norms, Attitudes, And Knowledge Of Institutional Policy. Ethics Behav 11(3), 233–247

Kibler, W. L. (1993). Academic Dishonesty: A Student Development Dilemma. Naspa Journal. 30. 253-262.

Kompas.(2015). Jual Beli Gelar Sarjana.[Online] dari http://print.kompas.com/baca/2015/05/28/Jual-Beli-Gelar-Sarjana

Lambert, E. G., Hogan , N. L. , Barton , S. M. (2003). Collegiate Academic Dishonesty Revisited: What Have They Done, How Often Have They Done It, Who Does It, and Why They Do It? Electronic Journal of Sociology . 7 ( 4 ) . http://www.sociology.org/content/vol7.4/lambert_etal. html .

Lescroart, Y., & Mariya, A. (2014). Ethical Beliefs Toward Academic Dishonesty: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Undergraduate Students in Ukraine and the United States. J Acad Ethics (2014) 12:29–41

Lestari, S., & Asyanti, S. (2015). Apakah siswa SMP berperilaku jujur dalam situasi ulangan? .The 2nd University Research Coloquium 2015 ISSN 2407-9189

Manurung, R. (2012). Pendidikan Antikorupsi Sebagai Satuan Pembelajaran Berkarakter Dan Humanistik. Jurnal Sosioteknologi, 27 (11).

McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1997). Individual and contextual influences on academic dishonesty: A multicampus investigation. Journal Research in Higher Education, 38, 379–396

Murdock, T. B., & Anderman, E. M. (2006).motivational perspectives on student cheating: toward an integrated model of academic dishonesty. Jurnal Educational Psychologist, 41 (3), 129–145.

Mujahidah (2009).Perilaku menyontek laki-laki dan perempuan Studi Meta Analisisis.Jurnal Psikologi, 2 (2), 177-199.

Moleong, L. (2012). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya

Murphy, M.M., & Banas, S. L. (2009).Character Education Overcoming Prejudice. New york: Chelsea House publisher

Nursani & Irianto. (2013). Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa: Dimensi Freuf Diammond. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa FEB, 2 (2) diakses http://portalgaruda.org/?ref=browse&mod=viewarticle&article=189748.

Pujiatni, K. & Lestari, S. (2010). Studi Kualitatif Pengalaman Menyontek Pada Mahasiswa Jurnal Penelitian Humaniora, Vol. 11 (2). 103-110.

Purnamasari, D. (2013). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kecurangan Akademik Pada Mahasiswa.Educational Psychology Journal, 2 (1), 13-21.

Roig, M., & Caso, M. (2005). Lying And Cheating: Fraudulent Excuse Making, Cheating, And Plagiarism. The Journal of Psychology, 139 (6), 485–494.

Whitley, B. E. (1998). Factors Associated With Cheating Among College Students: A Review. Journal Research in Higher Education, 39 (3), 235–274.


Article View

Abstract views : 125 times | PDF files viewed : 97 times

Dimensions, PlumX, and Google Scholar Metrics

10.21070/psikologia.v2i1.1258


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2017 Psikologia : Jurnal Psikologi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.