Nurul Muizzah Johari


This study aims to provide an understanding of information behavior with technology based on gender. It also to investigate the relationship between information behavior and degree of technology affinity. This research has been conducted quantitatively and using survey to gain data from participants.  Participant are selected randomly across Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Sarawak. The instrument are adopted from Mills, Knezek, and Wakefield (2013) which taking interest into information behavior (ICTL) as well as technology affinity. The reliability for Information and Communication Technology Learning (ICTL) is 0.835 while for Technology Affinity Scale (TAS) is 0.831.  Statistical Analysis for Social Science Package (SPSS) are used to analyze the data obtained through Independent T-test and Pearson Correlation test. Findings indicate that no significant difference found for understanding of information behavior with technology based on gender. While, another finding indicate that there is no significant relationship between information behavior and technology affinity.  Improvement suggested obtain from the findings are  providing understanding on the types of information behavior possess by each learner and helps educator as well as learner to plan their teaching and learning session to promote better indulgent of the knowledge.


Information behavior; Technology affinity.

Full Text:



Alkubut, A. Y., Kelle, P., Pawlowski, S. D., & Schneider, H. (2009). To share or not to share? Examining the factors influencing local agency electronic information sharing. International Journal of Business Information Systems,4(2).

Bannert, M. & Arbinger, P. R. (1996). Gender-related differences in exposure to and use of computers: Results of a survey of secondary school students. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 11 (3), 269-282.

Bigdeli, A. Z., Kamal, M. & de Cesare, S. (2013). Information sharing through inter-organizational systems in local government. Transforming Government: People, Process, and Policy,7(2).

Blueprint, M. E. Blueprint 2013-2025 (2013). Preliminary Report. Preschool to Post-Secondary Education. Ministry of Education Malaysia.

CLN, O. V. N., Uche, E. U., & Ejiro, A. K. (2015). Information seeking behavior of faculty members in a Nigerion university. International Journal of Academic Research and Reflection,3(4), 95-102.

Copper, J. & Stone, J. (1996). Gender, computer-assisted learning and anxiety: With a little help from a friend. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 15(1), 67- 91.

Dervin, B. (1983). An overview of sense-making research: Concepts, methods, and results to date. Seattle: School of Communications, University of Washington.

Dubi, M. & Rutsch, A. (1998). Informationssuche von Jugendlichen auf dem Internet. Vordiplomarbeit. Department of Psychology, University Bem, Switzerland. Re.

Ellis, D. & Haugan, M. (1997). Modeling the information seeking pattern of engineers and research scientist in an industrial environment. Journal of Documentation, 53, 384-403.

Ellis, D. (1987). The derivation of a behavioral model for information retrieval design. Information Studies, Sheffield, University of Sheffield.

Ellis, D., Cox, D. et. al. (1993). A comparison of the information seeking patterns of researchers in the physical and social sciences. Journal of Documentation, 49, 356- 369.

Houtz, L. E., & Gupta, U. G. (2001). Nebraska high school students’ computer skills and attitudes. Journal of Research on Computing in Education,33(3), 316-327.

Kakai, M., Ikoja-Odongo, R., & Kigongo-Bukenya, I. M. N. (2004). A study of the information seeking behavior of undergraduate students of Makerere University, Uganda. World Libraries,14(1), 544-564.

Krikelas, J. (1983). Information-seeking Behavior: Patterns and Concepts. Drexel library quarterly, 19(2), 5-20.

Koh, K. (2013). Adolescents’ information creating-behavior embedded in digital media practices using Scratch. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(9), 1826-1841.

Kuhlthau, C. C. (1994). Seeking meaning: A process approach to library and information services. Norwood, NJ. Ablex Publishing.

Liu, X., Macmillan, R., & Timmons, V. (1998). Integrating computers into the curriculum: How teachers may hinder students’ use of computers. McHill Journal of Education, 33(1), 51-69.

Mills, L. & Knezek, G. (2012). Measuring learning preferences within the integrated communications learning landscape. In P. Resta (Ed.), Proceedings of society for information technology and teacher education international conference 2012 (pp. 1994-1999), Chesapeake, VA.

Oh, K. (2014). The process of organizing personal information. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick.

Pages, Y. (2014). Yellow TM social media report. What Australian people and businesses are doing with social media. In Edited by Holmes, D. and Brough, L. Melbourne, Australia.

Rafaeli, S. & Raban, D. R. (2005). Information sharing online: a research challenge. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 1(1), 62-79.

Suraya, H., & Sarah, B. (2015). Information seeking behavior and international students’ role of social media in addressing challenges while abroad. Proceedings of the 5th International Conferences on Computing and Informatics, 11-13 August 2015.

Talja, S. (2002). Information sharing in academic communities: Types and levels of collaboration in information seeking and use. New Review of Information Behavior Research, 3(1), 143- 159.

Weiler, A. (2005). Information-seeking behavior in Generation Y students: motivation, critical thinking, and learning theory. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 31(1), 46-53.

Wilson, T. D. (1999). Models in information behavior research. Journal of Documentation,55(3), 249-270.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2017 Proceedings of the ICECRS

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.