Legal Consequences for Leasing Companies That do not Provide Funds in Accordance to the Initial Agreement [Akibat Hukum Bagi Perusahaan Leasing yang Tidak Memberikan Dana Sesuai Kesepakatan Awal]



Author (s)


(1) * Agus Dwi Arifudin   (Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo)  
        Indonesia
(2)  M. Tanzil Multazam   (Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo)  
        Indonesia
(3)  Noor Fatimah Mediawati   (Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo)  
        Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Leasing is an activity in the field of financing such as banks, but not banks in the form of providing capital goods that have option rights and a certain period of time. The research is expected to add insight and as an input for the community about legal issues and issues regarding lease agreements made by leasing financing institutions. The method used is a statute approach approach based on the current legislation, and a conceptual approach to reviewing the views and doctrines that develop in the field of legal science. Leasing companies that do not provide loan funds in accordance with the purchase lease agreement, according to Article 1320 of the Indonesian Civil Code, the agreement is legally flawed and can be canceled, and deemed to have never existed. Because in this agreement the objective conditions in Article 1320 of the Indonesian Civil Code are not fulfilled because they have committed fraud against the contents of the agreement.


Keywords

law effect; agreement ; leasing







References


[1] M. S. S. Wulandari, H. A. Uzaimi, M. S. H. I. SE.AK., and S.E., “Analisis Pembiayaan Melalui Finance Lease Dan Aplikasi Perlakuan Akuntansi Leasing Berdasarkan Psak No.30 Tahun 2012 Pada PT. Adira Dinamika Multi Finance Tanjungpinang,” J. Akunt., vol. 30, no. 31, 2016.

[2] Presiden, “Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 9 Tahun 2009 Tentang Lembaga Pembiayaan,” pp. 1–5, 2009.

[3] M. A. Drs. Siti Mirhani, “Akuntansi Aktiva Leasing,” pp. 1–12, 2003.

[4] M. Djumhana, “Hukum Perbankan di Indonesia.” p. 214, 1996.

[5] I. G. P. P. Sarjana, “Pengaturan Batas Waktu Pendaftaran Jaminan Fidusia Pada Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999,” no. 42, pp. 1–17, 1999.

[6] J. Ibrahim, “Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif,” 2006.

[7] Ishaq, “Metode Penelitian Hukum dan Penulisan Skripsi, Tesis dan Disertasi.” Bandung.

[8] S. M. Soejono Soekantor, “Perjanjian Sewa beli.” 2007.

[9] M. Agung, “Putusan No. 1223 K/ Pdt/ 2012,” 2012.

[10] A. Suryanagara and J. L. Alvi Syahrin, M. Hamdan, “Dakwaan Batal Demi Hukum Setelah Pemeriksaan Pokok Perkara Dalam Sidang Pengadilan (Studi Putusan Nomor 19/Pid.Sus/2015/PN.Sim),” vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 204–220, 2016.

[11] D. I. W. W. Ni Komang Devayanti, “Aspek Hukum Perjanjian Sewa Beli,” pp. 1–5, 2009.

[12] T. Wahyu and S. Lestari, “Kom parasi Syarat Keabsahan ‘ Sebab Yang Halal ’ Dalam Perjanjian Konvensional Dan Perjanjian Syariah,” vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2017.

[13] P. Anindya, “Pembatalan Perjanjian Secara Sepihak,” vol. 24, pp. 8–48, 2009.


Article View

Abstract views : 24 times



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Authors

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.