Akibat Hukum Terhadap Perjanjian Alih Debitur Atau Oper Kredit Tanpa Persetujuan Perusahaan Pembiayaan Dengan Objek Jaminan Fidusia Kendaraan Bermotor

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/ijler.v1i1.1747

Author (s)


(1) * Muhammad Harbitan Dinata   (Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo)  
        Indonesia
(2)  Noor Fatimah Mediawati   (Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo)  
        Indonesia
(3)  Sri Budi Purwaningsih   (Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo)  
        Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


In this globalization era, the needs of the society in finance activity has been increased, therefore, the finance companies got a great demand from the societies, particularly in the payment of vehicle.The frequent problem in the implementation of vehicle financing credit is the transition of the credit from debtors to new debtors without the approval of the Financing Company. The purpose of this study is to find out the impact of the law through the transitionagreement credit to the new debtors without the approval from the Financing Company. This study uses normative research with statute approach. The results showed that the legal consequences of the loan transfer agreement without the approval of the finance company resulted in the agreement is invalidsince it violated the objective terms of the agreement.The agreement of the credit transfer without the approval of the Financing Company violates the fiduciary guarantee law which prohibits the loan shift without prior approval of the Financing Company.This study give benefit and knowledge for the author, particularly for the societies about the legal consequences of credit transfer agreements without the approval of financing companies.



Keywords

legal concequence; agreement; financing company.







References


[1] Simarmata Ambatua, “Perusahaan Pembiayaan Konsumen (Consumers Finance) dan Prinsip Kehati-hatiannya,” pp. 61–62, 2012.

[2] “Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 84/PMK.012/2006 Tentang Perusahaan Pembiayaan,” 2006.

[3] Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Perdata. .

[4] R. WAHYUNI, M. K. RIKA LESTARI, SH., M.Hum ULFIA HASANAH, SH., and Abstrak, “PELAKSANAAN PERJANJIAN PEMBIAYAAN KONSUMEN PADA PERUSAHAAN PEMBIAYAAN PT. FEDERAL INTERNASIONAL FINANCE CABANG SIAK,” pp. 1–16, 2009.

[5] D. Umi, “Akibat Hukum Tidak Didaftarkannya Objek Jaminan Fidusia Oleh PT.Federal International Finance (FIF) Samarinda,” J. Beraja Niti, vol. 1 No 9, p. 7, 2012.

[6] M. H. Dinata, Wawancara dengan Kiki Andridhitya. 2018.

[7] P. K. Michael, Penyerahan Barang Oleh Penjual Dalam Perjanjian Jual Beli Air Galon Kepada Pengusaha Mini Market Mega Mitra Kelurahan Akcaya Kota Pontianak. 2016.

[8] M. Yuliana, Pelaksanaan Perjanjian Sewa Menyewa Antara Penyewa Dengan Pemilik Rumah Di Desa Kapur Komplek Graha Kapur Kecamatan Sungai Raya Kabupaten Kubu Raya. 2017.

[9] A. Sheeny, Fidusia Sebagai Jaminan Dalam Pemberian Kredit Di Perusda BPR Bank Pasar Klaten. 2009.

[10] B. Rosdalina, “Urgensi Perjanjian Dalam Hubungan Keperdataan,” p. 7.

[11] “Undang Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia,” 1999.

[12] N. Suparto, “Prinsip kepemilikan hak pada pembebanan jaminan fidusia,” J. RECHTENS, vol. 4, p. 43, 2015.

[13] H. Y. Mhd, “Pengaturan Lembaga Jaminan Di Indonesia Perspektif Undang Undang No.42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia,” p. 115.


Article View

Abstract views : 29 times

Dimensions, PlumX, and Google Scholar Metrics

10.21070/ijler.v1i1.1747


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 IJLER (Indonesian Journal Law and Economic Review)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.